<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gryffyd Eamonn Dempsey &#187; Watches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gryffyddempsey.com/category/watches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gryffyddempsey.com</link>
	<description>Unnecessaries and Effluvia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This Time the Dream&#8217;s on Me</title>
		<link>http://www.gryffyddempsey.com/this-time-the-dreams-on-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gryffyddempsey.com/this-time-the-dreams-on-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gryffyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Watches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryffyddempsey.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I am wearing my Timex watch. I could take a picture, upload it to my computer and post it here, but why bother when one can nab a pic from the inters that somewhat approximates what it is I wish you to see? So viddy this: Mine doesn&#8217;t have the luminescent hands or the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I am wearing my Timex watch. I could take a picture, upload it to my computer and post it here, but why bother when one can nab a pic from the inters that somewhat approximates what it is I wish you to see? So viddy <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/10196893@N03/1253706150">this</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gryffyddempsey.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tim.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-243" title="tim" src="http://www.gryffyddempsey.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/tim-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>Mine doesn&#8217;t have the luminescent hands or the lume dots around the chapter ring.  Mine also has a new Timex flex metal band.  Other than that it&#8217;s pretty much a match.  I bought mine because I wanted to get a simple mechanical watch, and looking in eBay found mine, for less than $40.  Besides the classic look of the watch, the information that it was made in 1969, the same year I was made, was a draw (the watch in the picture above is from 1968).  Normally I like date windows on my watches (and I like that such features on a watch face are called &#8220;complications&#8221;) but this one probably benefits from its simplicity.</p>
<p>I could be a watch enthusiast if I had the money.  I find the design of some very compelling.  That said, I don&#8217;t feel any compulsion to collect and hoard watches for their own sake and learn everything about them.  They&#8217;re not <em>that </em>interesting, and it&#8217;s more particular styles rather than brands or eras that interest me.  However, I do sometimes lurk in watch enthusiast fora.  Here is one for <a href="http://http://www.network54.com/Forum/446505/">Timex</a>.</p>
<p>Next up: my vintage underpants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gryffyddempsey.com/this-time-the-dreams-on-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

